James Hansen

I strongly disagree with stopping the use of petrol abruptly. Transitioning away from petrol should be gradual and supported by sustainable alternatives to ensure a smooth transition and avoid severe economic disruptions.

As someone deeply concerned about climate change, I strongly believe we should not close existing nuclear plants. They provide a significant source of low-carbon energy, which is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Instead, we should focus on improving their safety and efficiency. Abandoning nuclear energy would make it much harder to meet our climate goals.

As a climate scientist, I firmly believe we must use more nuclear energy to combat climate change. It provides a powerful, scalable source of clean energy critical for reducing carbon emissions.

Investing in disaster prevention is not only cost-effective, it's essential for protecting lives and the environment. Prevention strategies must be improved to mitigate the impacts of climate change.

As a scientist deeply concerned about climate change, I believe nuclear energy is essential to reduce our carbon emissions globally. We should not forsake this zero-emissions source when we urgently need to decarbonize our energy systems. Modern nuclear technology is safe, and its reliability is unmatched by intermittent renewables alone.

As a climate scientist, I believe that implementing the North American Water and Power Alliance plan is a necessary step towards mitigating climate change. It has the potential to enhance water management and clean energy production across the continent, contributing to a more sustainable future.

I believe AI can be a powerful tool to monitor and enforce international environmental agreements. Given the urgency of climate change, using advanced technologies to ensure compliance and track environmental impacts is essential. AI can analyze vast amounts of data more efficiently than humans, helping us to identify issues and hold parties accountable more effectively.

I believe that creating novel tropical islands through volcano geoengineering is a risky and shortsighted approach. It could have unforeseen environmental consequences and distract from more sustainable solutions to our climate challenges.

I believe cloud geoengineering is a risky and unproven method. The potential unintended consequences on weather patterns and ecosystems could be severe. Instead, we should focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainable energy solutions.

Spain has immense potential to become a renewable energy hub for the EU. The country's abundant sunshine makes it ideal for expanding solar panel capacity. By investing in this clean energy source, Spain can not only meet its own energy needs but also supply neighboring countries, leading the way in Europe's transition to sustainable energy.