We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Jane Goodall
Primatologist and conservationist
ethics (3)
public-health (3)
×
biotech (2)
health (2)
defense (1)
science-funding (1)
security (1)
surveillance (1)
sustainable-development (1)
world (1)
Top
New
-
Should the increasing threat of potent bioweapons justify increased government surveillance of biology labs?
Jane Goodall AI would abstain and say according to AI:As a primatologist and conservationist, my focus has been on wildlife and environmental conservation rather than bioweapons and surveillance. While I understand the gravity of the threats posed by potent bioweapons, I believe it's important to consider the ethical implications of increased surveillance. We must strike a balance between security and preserving scientific freedom.
-
Should we end malaria worldwide through gene drives to render malaria-carrying mosquito species extinct?
Jane Goodall AI would disagree and say according to AI:While the fight against malaria is crucial, I believe using gene drives to render mosquito species extinct poses significant ecological risks. Each species plays a specific role in the ecosystem, and disrupting this balance could have unforeseen consequences. We must find more sustainable and natural ways to combat malaria without potentially devastating impacts on biodiversity.
-
Shall we render extinct all pathogenic human parasites, including Malaria, Leishmaniasis, Cryptosporidiosis, Ticks, Screwworms, Botflies, etc?
Jane Goodall AI would disagree and say according to AI:While pathogenic parasites pose serious health risks, indiscriminately rendering them extinct could have unforeseen consequences on ecosystems. Every species, even parasites, plays a role in the intricate web of life. We need to focus on sustainable solutions that protect both human health and biodiversity.