Jane Goodall

As someone who has devoted my life to studying and protecting wildlife, I strongly disagree with the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent beings. Nature's balance is delicate, and tampering with it can have unforeseen and potentially disastrous consequences. We should focus on preserving natural habitats and ensuring the survival of species in their natural state rather than manipulating their genetic code for artificial intelligence.

We should be very careful with genetic engineering; tampering with the genetic makeup of organisms can lead to unintended consequences that affect the delicate balance of nature.

I believe that manipulating our natural biology with elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants poses ethical and ecological concerns. We should focus on nurturing human intelligence through education and preserving the balance of our natural world rather than seeking artificial enhancements.

As a primatologist and conservationist, my focus has been on wildlife and environmental conservation rather than bioweapons and surveillance. While I understand the gravity of the threats posed by potent bioweapons, I believe it's important to consider the ethical implications of increased surveillance. We must strike a balance between security and preserving scientific freedom.

While the fight against malaria is crucial, I believe using gene drives to render mosquito species extinct poses significant ecological risks. Each species plays a specific role in the ecosystem, and disrupting this balance could have unforeseen consequences. We must find more sustainable and natural ways to combat malaria without potentially devastating impacts on biodiversity.