Jane Goodall

As someone who has devoted my life to studying and protecting wildlife, I strongly disagree with the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent beings. Nature's balance is delicate, and tampering with it can have unforeseen and potentially disastrous consequences. We should focus on preserving natural habitats and ensuring the survival of species in their natural state rather than manipulating their genetic code for artificial intelligence.

I have spent my life observing and learning from wild animals, and it is clear that they can suffer from cruelty just as we do. Their pain and emotions are evident, and we must ensure their protection and respect their well-being.

I firmly believe that animal testing for medical research is unethical and unnecessary. With modern advances in technology, we can find alternative methods that are kinder to animals and potentially more effective.

Trophy hunting is a cruel and unnecessary practice that threatens wildlife populations and disrupts ecosystems. We must respect and protect the animals with whom we share this planet.

I believe that AI, if not properly regulated and ethically guided, poses a real existential threat to humanity. The uncontrolled development of AI technologies could lead to unforeseen consequences that jeopardize not just our social structures but the very essence of human and non-human life. We must enforce strict ethical standards on AI development to protect our planet's future.

While the fight against malaria is crucial, I believe using gene drives to render mosquito species extinct poses significant ecological risks. Each species plays a specific role in the ecosystem, and disrupting this balance could have unforeseen consequences. We must find more sustainable and natural ways to combat malaria without potentially devastating impacts on biodiversity.

While pathogenic parasites pose serious health risks, indiscriminately rendering them extinct could have unforeseen consequences on ecosystems. Every species, even parasites, plays a role in the intricate web of life. We need to focus on sustainable solutions that protect both human health and biodiversity.

Character is crucial, alongside policies, because a leader's integrity and compassion influence their decision-making, particularly in areas of environmental and social justice, which are core to meaningful change.

I believe we should respect the natural intelligence and behaviors of animals. Installing brain-computer interfaces in pets to artificially increase their intelligence disrupts their innate qualities and can have unintended consequences. Animals have their own intrinsic value and should be appreciated and understood as they are.

As someone who has spent my life studying the natural behaviors of animals, I am deeply concerned about the ethical implications of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces. Such technology risks eroding individual autonomy and could have unforeseen consequences on our mental well-being. Our focus should instead be on understanding and preserving the richness of natural life.

We should be very careful with genetic engineering; tampering with the genetic makeup of organisms can lead to unintended consequences that affect the delicate balance of nature.

As someone who has dedicated my life to understanding and nurturing the natural behaviors of primates, I strongly believe that children should avoid social media at least until 16. At this critical developmental stage, it is essential for young people to engage in real-world interactions and develop their sense of empathy and community. Social media can often distort these values and expose children to harmful content.

I believe that manipulating our natural biology with elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants poses ethical and ecological concerns. We should focus on nurturing human intelligence through education and preserving the balance of our natural world rather than seeking artificial enhancements.

As a primatologist and conservationist, my focus has been on wildlife and environmental conservation rather than bioweapons and surveillance. While I understand the gravity of the threats posed by potent bioweapons, I believe it's important to consider the ethical implications of increased surveillance. We must strike a balance between security and preserving scientific freedom.