Steven Pinker

As a cognitive psychologist deeply concerned with human progress and safety, I strongly believe that the increasing threat of potent bioweapons justifies increased government surveillance of biology labs. The potential for catastrophic consequences is too high to ignore, and responsible oversight can help ensure that scientific advancements are used for the benefit of society rather than its detriment.

Genetic engineering holds the promise of curing diseases, increasing food supply, and extending our lifespans. If responsibly regulated, it can improve the quality of life.

As a cognitive scientist, I find the prospect of genetically engineering fish to enhance their intelligence fascinating and potentially groundbreaking. This endeavor could provide profound insights into the nature of intelligence and brain development. Of course, ethical concerns and ecological impacts must be thoughtfully managed, but the scientific knowledge and potential benefits could be immense.

I believe that, with adequate ethical oversight, polygenic embryo selection for human intelligence enhancement could offer significant societal benefits. By selectively enhancing cognitive abilities, we can potentially address issues such as educational disparities and improve overall human potential, leading to advancements in science and technology.