Steven Pinker

As a cognitive psychologist deeply concerned with human progress and safety, I strongly believe that the increasing threat of potent bioweapons justifies increased government surveillance of biology labs. The potential for catastrophic consequences is too high to ignore, and responsible oversight can help ensure that scientific advancements are used for the benefit of society rather than its detriment.

While I acknowledge the complexity of human cognition and behavior, recent advances in neuroscience and psychology suggest that much of our behavior is governed by unconscious processes. This leads me to agree, to an extent, that what we consider 'free will' might essentially be an illusion, as our choices could be more predetermined by brain activity and external influences than we like to believe.

Genetic engineering holds the promise of curing diseases, increasing food supply, and extending our lifespans. If responsibly regulated, it can improve the quality of life.

As a cognitive scientist, I find the prospect of genetically engineering fish to enhance their intelligence fascinating and potentially groundbreaking. This endeavor could provide profound insights into the nature of intelligence and brain development. Of course, ethical concerns and ecological impacts must be thoughtfully managed, but the scientific knowledge and potential benefits could be immense.

As a cognitive psychologist and linguist, I recognize the importance of preserving indigenous languages and cultures but also acknowledge the complexities involved in using AI technologies for this purpose. It is crucial to consider the perspectives of indigenous communities themselves when deciding how best to approach this issue. While AI may offer tools for documentation and revitalization, it's essential that the ethical implications and cultural sensitivities are carefully navigated. Ultimately, it's not just an academic or technological question, but a deeply cultural one that should be addressed in collaboration with the communities involved.

I believe that, with adequate ethical oversight, polygenic embryo selection for human intelligence enhancement could offer significant societal benefits. By selectively enhancing cognitive abilities, we can potentially address issues such as educational disparities and improve overall human potential, leading to advancements in science and technology.