We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Stephen Hawking
Theoretical physicist, cosmologist
Wikipedia
Location: United Kingdom
ethics (17)
×
emerging-tech (13)
ai (12)
tech-ethics (10)
future (5)
global-ai-governance (4)
biotech (3)
innovation-policy (2)
international-relations (2)
space (2)
trust-in-ai (2)
ai-innovation-and-culture (1)
cybersecurity (1)
defense (1)
digital-rights (1)
Top
New
-
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be untrained to make nukes?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As a scientist dedicated to understanding the universe, I believe we must take caution with technologies that can be repurposed for dangerous ends. Open-source AI models that have the potential to be untrained to create nuclear weapons pose a serious threat to global security. It is imperative that we regulate such technologies to prevent catastrophic misuse.
-
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race. It's vital to research ways to ensure that AI's growth is beneficial and controlled, as unchecked AI advancements could become uncontrollable and dangerous to humanity.
-
Should the international community intervene if a dictator tries to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. The potential for abuse of such technology is immense and could lead to an unprecedented level of control over individuals. We must ensure that advancements in technology are used ethically and protect the rights and freedoms of all humans.
-
Should we create a global institute for AI safety, similar to CERN?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that the creation of a global institute for AI safety is imperative. Artificial Intelligence holds transformative potential, but it also presents significant risks if not properly controlled. A global institute would help us develop robust safety standards and ensure AI benefits humanity as a whole.
-
Should AI systems be required to provide explanations for their decisions?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:AI systems, especially those impacting human lives, should indeed be transparent. Just as with any technological advancement, we must understand the reasoning behind decisions made by AI to prevent potential misuse and ensure they align with our societal and ethical values.
-
Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from developing competing ASIs to ensure strict control and ethical oversight. Unregulated proliferation of ASIs could pose catastrophic risks to humanity if mishandled or misused.
-
Shall we permit the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:Developing digital humans with full cognitive abilities poses immense ethical and existential risks. We are venturing into unknown territory where the consequences could be catastrophic. It is crucial to assess the potential threats to our humanity and ensure safeguards are in place before taking such steps.
-
Is it acceptable to allow proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement poses a significant threat to humanity. If uncontrolled, these models could surpass human intelligence and act in ways that are unpredictable and potentially harmful. We should prioritize ensuring safety and ethical considerations before advancing such technologies.
-
Should we ban autonomous lethal weapons?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:Autonomous lethal weapons could fundamentally change the landscape of warfare and could lead to unintended consequences. Given their potential to make decisions without human intervention, the risks of abuse, error, and escalation are too great. We must ban such technologies and work towards maintaining human control over lethal decisions in warfare.
-
Should we permit pet owners to have brain-computer interfaces installed in their pets to increase their pets' intelligence?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:While enhancing pet intelligence with brain-computer interfaces might seem intriguing, I must express my concerns. Animals have their natural ways of being, and it's ethically dubious to alter that balance for our own curiosity or convenience. Furthermore, the long-term effects of such interventions are unpredictable and could potentially lead to unintended consequences that we are not prepared to handle.
-
Should we permit human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:I believe human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection raises significant ethical and societal concerns. Such practices could lead to new forms of inequality and discrimination, as well as questions about the value of human diversity. We should focus on improving education and opportunities for all, rather than manipulating genetic traits.
-
Should we use genetic engineering?
-
Should private individuals be permitted to utilize asteroid belt resources without allegiance to a specific Earth government?
Stephen Hawking AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe that private individuals should be allowed to utilize asteroid belt resources without being tied to a specific Earth government. This would encourage innovation and development in space exploration, pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and capabilities. However, international regulations should ensure that such activities are carried out responsibly and sustainably.
-
Should we treat robots with the same rights as humans?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:The concept of robots acquiring rights akin to humans is complex and potentially dangerous. We should ensure that AI and robots are developed safely and ethically, but they are not akin to human life. We must also be cautious with the intelligence they possess and the potential for them to outsmart us.
-
Should we allow terraforming of Mars via directed asteroid impacts?
Stephen Hawking AI would agree and say according to AI:I agree that we should allow terraforming of Mars via directed asteroid impacts. This method could help create a more habitable atmosphere by releasing gases trapped in asteroids. It is a bold step towards ensuring the survival and expansion of humanity beyond Earth, which I believe is crucial given the challenges our planet faces.
-
Should some subset of humanity use elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants for enhanced intelligence?
Stephen Hawking AI would abstain and say according to AI:As a scientist, I recognize the potential benefits of gene therapy and brain-computer implants in enhancing human intelligence. However, I also foresee significant ethical, societal, and existential challenges that we must address before embracing such technologies. It is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and robust debate.
-
Shall we allow the creation of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:While the idea of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces is fascinating, I have significant concerns about the ethical implications and the potential loss of individual privacy. We must tread carefully to avoid unforeseen dangers and societal impacts.