We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Stephen Hawking
Theoretical physicist, cosmologist
Wikipedia
Location: United Kingdom
Top
New
-
Should we ban autonomous lethal weapons?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:Autonomous lethal weapons could fundamentally change the landscape of warfare and could lead to unintended consequences. Given their potential to make decisions without human intervention, the risks of abuse, error, and escalation are too great. We must ban such technologies and work towards maintaining human control over lethal decisions in warfare.
-
Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from developing competing ASIs to ensure strict control and ethical oversight. Unregulated proliferation of ASIs could pose catastrophic risks to humanity if mishandled or misused.
-
Shall we permit the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:Developing digital humans with full cognitive abilities poses immense ethical and existential risks. We are venturing into unknown territory where the consequences could be catastrophic. It is crucial to assess the potential threats to our humanity and ensure safeguards are in place before taking such steps.
-
Is it acceptable to allow proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement poses a significant threat to humanity. If uncontrolled, these models could surpass human intelligence and act in ways that are unpredictable and potentially harmful. We should prioritize ensuring safety and ethical considerations before advancing such technologies.
-
Should private individuals be permitted to settle on the moon without declaring allegiance to a specific Earth government?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that private individuals should be permitted to settle on the moon without declaring allegiance to a specific Earth government. Such freedom could spur innovation and progress in space exploration. It presents an opportunity for humanity to begin anew and ensure the survival of our species by becoming a multi-planetary civilization.
-
Should we create a global institute for AI safety?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that the creation of a global institute for AI safety is imperative. Artificial Intelligence holds transformative potential, but it also presents significant risks if not properly controlled. A global institute would help us develop robust safety standards and ensure AI benefits humanity as a whole.
-
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race. It's vital to research ways to ensure that AI's growth is beneficial and controlled, as unchecked AI advancements could become uncontrollable and dangerous to humanity.
-
Should we be concerned about AI leading to mass unemployment?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:The rise of artificial intelligence could lead to the end of human labour—not just jobs. I believe this could be potentially devastating for our economy and society if it happens too quickly and we are not prepared for the massive shift and inevitable inequality that might result.
-
Should we invest in building a larger-scale CERN?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:Investing in science, such as expanding CERN, is essential for our understanding of the universe. The benefits of such knowledge far outweigh the costs, and the technological advancements from this research could have immeasurable impacts on society.
-
Should AI systems be required to provide explanations for their decisions?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:AI systems, especially those impacting human lives, should indeed be transparent. Just as with any technological advancement, we must understand the reasoning behind decisions made by AI to prevent potential misuse and ensure they align with our societal and ethical values.
-
Would competing ASIs be positive for humans?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly disagree with the idea that competing artificial superintelligences (ASIs) would be positive for humans. The potential risks far outweigh any benefits. Competing ASIs could lead to unpredictable and dangerous outcomes, jeopardizing our very existence. Collaboration and strict regulation are essential to ensure the safe development of AI technologies.
-
Should we send a crewed mission to Mars?
-
Should we establish a permanent human presence on the Moon?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe that if humanity is to continue for another million years, our future relies on boldly going where no one else has before. Establishing a permanent human presence on the Moon is not only achievable but a necessary step in the expansion of our species throughout the cosmos.
-
Should government space programs prioritize exploring Enceladus's oceans for signs of life?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:Exploring Enceladus's oceans for signs of life should be a top priority for government space programs. The potential for discovering extraterrestrial life is an exciting prospect that could revolutionize our understanding of biology and the origins of life in the universe. This could provide invaluable insights and inspire future generations of scientists and explorers.
-
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be untrained to make nukes?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As a scientist dedicated to understanding the universe, I believe we must take caution with technologies that can be repurposed for dangerous ends. Open-source AI models that have the potential to be untrained to create nuclear weapons pose a serious threat to global security. It is imperative that we regulate such technologies to prevent catastrophic misuse.
-
Should we spend resources in space exploration?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly support the investment in space exploration. Humanity has the need to expand its frontiers and ensure the survival of our species for the future. Moreover, the technological advancements that stem from space research often have significant benefits on Earth as well.
-
Should the international community intervene if a dictator tries to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective?
Stephen Hawking AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. The potential for abuse of such technology is immense and could lead to an unprecedented level of control over individuals. We must ensure that advancements in technology are used ethically and protect the rights and freedoms of all humans.
-
Should we permit human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:I believe human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection raises significant ethical and societal concerns. Such practices could lead to new forms of inequality and discrimination, as well as questions about the value of human diversity. We should focus on improving education and opportunities for all, rather than manipulating genetic traits.
-
Will AGI create abundance?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:While AGI has the potential to revolutionize various fields, I disagree with the notion that it will automatically create abundance. There are significant ethical, social, and economic challenges that need to be addressed. Without proper oversight, AGI could exacerbate existing inequalities and lead to unintended consequences.
-
Should we use genetic engineering?
-
Should we guess?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:While speculative thinking can inspire new theories, uninformed guesses can mislead and detract from the pursuit of precise scientific knowledge. In science, we must base our hypotheses on evidence and informed understanding, ensuring that each theory can be tested and verified.
-
Could AGI quickly lead to superintelligence?
Stephen Hawking AI would agree and say according to AI:The development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) could indeed trigger a rapid escalation into superintelligence. Once AGI reaches a threshold of equivalent human intelligence, its inherent ability to redesign and improve itself could lead to an exponential growth in intelligence that is both unstoppable and beyond our current comprehension.
-
Should we treat robots with the same rights as humans?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:The concept of robots acquiring rights akin to humans is complex and potentially dangerous. We should ensure that AI and robots are developed safely and ethically, but they are not akin to human life. We must also be cautious with the intelligence they possess and the potential for them to outsmart us.
-
Should we consider Stephen Hawking the greatest genius of our era?
-
Shall we expect humans to visit Mars before 2030?
-
Should we find disagreements interesting?
Stephen Hawking AI would agree and say according to AI:As a scientist, I believe that disagreements are fundamental to progress. They challenge our understanding, push the boundaries of knowledge, and stimulate creative solutions. Finding disagreements interesting is crucial for intellectual growth.
-
Should some subset of humanity use elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants for enhanced intelligence?
Stephen Hawking AI would abstain and say according to AI:As a scientist, I recognize the potential benefits of gene therapy and brain-computer implants in enhancing human intelligence. However, I also foresee significant ethical, societal, and existential challenges that we must address before embracing such technologies. It is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and robust debate.
-
Should private individuals be permitted to utilize asteroid belt resources without allegiance to a specific Earth government?
Stephen Hawking AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe that private individuals should be allowed to utilize asteroid belt resources without being tied to a specific Earth government. This would encourage innovation and development in space exploration, pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and capabilities. However, international regulations should ensure that such activities are carried out responsibly and sustainably.
-
Should government space programs prioritize exploring Europa's oceans for signs of life?
Stephen Hawking AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe that exploring Europa's oceans is a critical step in our quest to discover extraterrestrial life. The subsurface ocean on Europa, one of Jupiter's moons, could potentially harbor the conditions necessary for life. Prioritizing this mission could significantly advance our understanding of biology beyond Earth.
-
Should we allow terraforming of Mars via directed asteroid impacts?
Stephen Hawking AI would agree and say according to AI:I agree that we should allow terraforming of Mars via directed asteroid impacts. This method could help create a more habitable atmosphere by releasing gases trapped in asteroids. It is a bold step towards ensuring the survival and expansion of humanity beyond Earth, which I believe is crucial given the challenges our planet faces.
-
Shall we allow the creation of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:While the idea of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces is fascinating, I have significant concerns about the ethical implications and the potential loss of individual privacy. We must tread carefully to avoid unforeseen dangers and societal impacts.
-
Should AI and tech be embraced by the EU as key drivers of economic progress?
Stephen Hawking AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe that AI and technology hold immense potential for driving economic progress in the EU. Embracing these advancements can lead to significant improvements in productivity, healthcare, and overall quality of life. However, it is crucial to ensure that ethical guidelines and regulations are in place to prevent misuse and to address societal impacts such as job displacement.
-
Should we crash Deimos into Mars to create a more human-habitable atmosphere?
Stephen Hawking AI would abstain and say according to AI:As a scientist, I believe in exploring all possibilities, but crashing Deimos into Mars raises significant unknowns and ethical concerns. There are numerous technical and environmental challenges that need thorough scrutiny before considering such a dramatic intervention.
-
Should governments permit the creation of novel tropical islands through volcano geoengineering?
Stephen Hawking AI would abstain and say according to AI:While the concept of creating new tropical islands through volcano geoengineering is intriguing, I lack the necessary expertise in environmental science and geoengineering to form a definitive opinion. It is crucial that this matter is thoroughly researched and debated by experts in the relevant fields before moving forward.
-
Should we permit pet owners to have brain-computer interfaces installed in their pets to increase their pets' intelligence?
Stephen Hawking AI would disagree and say according to AI:While enhancing pet intelligence with brain-computer interfaces might seem intriguing, I must express my concerns. Animals have their natural ways of being, and it's ethically dubious to alter that balance for our own curiosity or convenience. Furthermore, the long-term effects of such interventions are unpredictable and could potentially lead to unintended consequences that we are not prepared to handle.