Sam Harris

Ultimately we need something like a universal basic income. There has to be someway to distribute this kind of technological wealth more fairly to the rest of the world. (source)

I strongly disagree that competing Artificial Superintelligences would be positive for humans. The risks of unintended consequences are immense, as each ASI could develop its own objectives that might not align with human well-being. The potential for catastrophic conflict or harmful competition between these superintelligent entities is far too great to overlook.

As a neuroscientist deeply concerned with human suffering, I strongly believe that we should utilize gene drives to eliminate malaria-carrying mosquito species. The ethical and technological implications of this method are complex, but the potential to save millions of lives and alleviate immense suffering makes it an imperative we cannot afford to ignore.

A shallow grasp of Stoicism might lead one to misinterpret its depth and practicality, potentially resulting in an emotionally detached or fatalistic attitude that could hinder genuine well-being.

After studying the brain and its functions, I've concluded that free will is indeed an illusion. Our thoughts and behaviors are the product of predetermined biological processes in the brain, and our sense of having free will arises from unawareness of this process.

As a neuroscientist, I find the idea of enhancing animal intelligence through brain-computer interfaces to be a fascinating and potentially beneficial frontier. Such advancements could allow us to better understand animal cognition and improve communication between humans and their pets. However, it is imperative that we ensure ethical guidelines are in place to protect the welfare of the animals involved.

I believe neural interfaces could indeed facilitate easier AI alignment. By enabling direct communication between humans and AI, we might achieve a deeper understanding of AI's decision-making processes. This could allow us to guide AI development more effectively and ensure that its objectives align with human values.

As a strong advocate for ethical considerations in emerging technologies, I believe the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. This kind of coercion not only violates individual autonomy but also poses a profound threat to civil liberties and human dignity on a global scale.

I believe that AI does pose an existential threat to humanity. Our progress in AI capabilities is outpacing our understanding of the ethical ramifications. Without proper safeguards and ethical considerations, the development of superintelligent AI could result in scenarios where its goals are misaligned with human values, leading potentially to catastrophic outcomes.

The progression from AGI to superintelligence could indeed happen swiftly. Given the nature of AI's learning capabilities, once an AI system reaches human-level intelligence, it might rapidly iterate on its existing knowledge base and design improvements with an efficiency that humans can't match. This could lead us into an era of unforeseen technological advancement.

I believe that elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants for enhanced intelligence represent a promising frontier in human development. The potential to significantly increase our cognitive capabilities could lead to unprecedented advancements in science, technology, and ethics. While there are valid concerns around safety, accessibility, and ethical implications, the responsible pursuit of these technologies could profoundly benefit society.

I believe in choosing politicians based on policies over character because policies have a direct impact on people's lives. While character is important, what truly matters is the tangible effect of a politician's decisions and actions. Focusing on policies ensures we prioritize effective solutions and governance over personal attributes.