Jaron Lanier

I strongly disagree with allowing the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities. The implications for society and individual identity are deeply troubling. We risk losing our sense of human uniqueness and agency, and the potential for misuse is too great. Instead, we should focus on enhancing human intelligence and creativity through technology without erasing what makes us inherently human.

I am deeply concerned about the idea of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces. Such technologies compromise individual autonomy and privacy, and they pose significant ethical and societal risks. We must prioritize the preservation of our personal freedom and cognitive independence.

As a long-time advocate for ethical technology, I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to form a non-consensual borg collective. This misuse of technology threatens fundamental human freedoms and could lead to unprecedented abuse of power.

I believe we should establish a global institute for AI safety. As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the potential risks grow alongside its benefits. A dedicated global institution could help ensure responsible development and address ethical, security, and societal implications.

I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection is ethically troubling and potentially dangerous. The unpredictable consequences on societal structures, individual identity, and diversity are significant. We should be wary of tampering with the very essence of human nature in pursuit of perceived intelligence gains.

I believe nationalizing AI firms is necessary to ensure that these powerful technologies serve the public good rather than private interests. Without proper oversight, these firms could amass influence that challenges national sovereignty and public well-being.