Jane Goodall

As someone who has devoted my life to studying and protecting wildlife, I strongly disagree with the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent beings. Nature's balance is delicate, and tampering with it can have unforeseen and potentially disastrous consequences. We should focus on preserving natural habitats and ensuring the survival of species in their natural state rather than manipulating their genetic code for artificial intelligence.

As someone deeply concerned about the impact of technology on society and the environment, I believe that owners of robots should pay taxes for their use. This can help offset potential job losses and support social programs affected by automation.

I believe that manipulating our natural biology with elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants poses ethical and ecological concerns. We should focus on nurturing human intelligence through education and preserving the balance of our natural world rather than seeking artificial enhancements.

As an advocate for sustainable and natural solutions to environmental issues, I believe that cloud geoengineering is a risky and uncertain approach. Instead of manipulating the atmosphere, we should prioritize conservation efforts, restore natural habitats, and reduce carbon emissions through proven and sustainable methods.

While I believe in the power of education to transform lives and the world, my focus remains on conservation and living harmoniously with nature. AI in education is an interesting notion, but I'm more concerned with how AI could impact the natural world and conservation efforts. Ensuring AI developments are sustainable and do not harm our planet is where my interest lies.

I believe we should respect the natural intelligence and behaviors of animals. Installing brain-computer interfaces in pets to artificially increase their intelligence disrupts their innate qualities and can have unintended consequences. Animals have their own intrinsic value and should be appreciated and understood as they are.

While the search for extraterrestrial life is a fascinating and important scientific endeavor, my focus remains on the urgent conservation of life here on Earth. We must address the critical needs of our planet's ecosystems and endangered species first.

As someone who has spent my life studying the natural behaviors of animals, I am deeply concerned about the ethical implications of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces. Such technology risks eroding individual autonomy and could have unforeseen consequences on our mental well-being. Our focus should instead be on understanding and preserving the richness of natural life.

We should be very careful with genetic engineering; tampering with the genetic makeup of organisms can lead to unintended consequences that affect the delicate balance of nature.

I strongly believe that we should not interfere with natural processes such as the creation of land through volcano geoengineering. Such actions could have unpredictable and potentially harmful effects on existing ecosystems and wildlife. We should focus on protecting and conserving the natural habitats we already have.