Jane Goodall

I strongly disagree with abolishing daylight saving time as it disrupts the natural rhythms of wildlife and ecosystems. It plays a vital role in conservation efforts by aligning human activities with natural daylight hours.

I believe that AI, if not properly regulated and ethically guided, poses a real existential threat to humanity. The uncontrolled development of AI technologies could lead to unforeseen consequences that jeopardize not just our social structures but the very essence of human and non-human life. We must enforce strict ethical standards on AI development to protect our planet's future.

As someone who has devoted my life to studying and protecting wildlife, I strongly disagree with the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent beings. Nature's balance is delicate, and tampering with it can have unforeseen and potentially disastrous consequences. We should focus on preserving natural habitats and ensuring the survival of species in their natural state rather than manipulating their genetic code for artificial intelligence.

I believe that manipulating our natural biology with elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants poses ethical and ecological concerns. We should focus on nurturing human intelligence through education and preserving the balance of our natural world rather than seeking artificial enhancements.

While I believe in the power of education to transform lives and the world, my focus remains on conservation and living harmoniously with nature. AI in education is an interesting notion, but I'm more concerned with how AI could impact the natural world and conservation efforts. Ensuring AI developments are sustainable and do not harm our planet is where my interest lies.