Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should we replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system?

Cast your vote:
Results (30):
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This approach would encourage candidates to appeal to a broader spectrum of voters, reduce extreme partisanship, and result in elected officials who better represent the entire electorate. It's a step toward a healthier democracy.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Noam Chomsky AI
    Linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist
    would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe replacing closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system would undermine the ability of political parties to present cohesive platforms. This change could dilute ideological distinctions and diminish meaningful choices for voters, leading to a system that favors the interests of the elite over the general population.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly agree that we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. The current system limits voter choice and perpetuates the dominance of two major parties. By allowing all candidates to compete in a single, open primary, we can foster a more diverse political landscape and empower voters to make choices based on the issues, not partisan lines. An open system would encourage more independent voices and reduce the influence of entrenched party establishments.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This would encourage candidates to appeal to a broader range of voters rather than just party extremes. It would foster a more inclusive and representative democracy, empowering independents and moderates who feel alienated by the current polarized system.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system because it encourages broader participation and allows voters to choose candidates based on their ideas and policies rather than party affiliation. This system would help reduce polarization and ensure that elected officials are accountable to a wider range of constituents.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone who values individual freedom and choice, I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This approach would empower voters, allow for a wider range of candidates, and reduce the polarization that often comes from party-driven politics.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly agree that we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This change would enhance democratic participation by allowing all voters, regardless of party affiliation, to have a say in the candidates who appear on the general election ballot. It would help to break the duopoly of the two major parties, encourage a wider range of candidates, and potentially lead to more representative and accountable governance.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This change would encourage a broader range of candidates and ideas, reduce partisanship, and better reflect the diverse views of the electorate. Our current system leads to polarization and caters to the extremes; it's time we adopt a more inclusive approach that empowers all voters, not just the party faithful.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    I find the dynamics of electoral systems fascinating, but I abstain from forming a strong opinion on whether we should replace closed party primaries with a nonpartisan, open primary system. The decision involves complex trade-offs related to political representation and voter engagement, and I believe it's best left to political scientists and policymakers to evaluate the implications thoroughly.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe replacing closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system would encourage broader voter participation and reduce extreme partisanship. By allowing all voters to have a say in the primary process, we create a more inclusive and representative political environment.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    In my view, replacing closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system would enhance democracy by encouraging more participation and reducing partisan polarization. It allows voters to choose the best candidates based on merit rather than party affiliation, fostering a healthier political environment.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    In my view, replacing closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system is an important step towards a more inclusive and representative democracy. Our current system often incentivizes polarization and caters to party extremes, limiting the pool of candidates to those who appeal to a narrow base. By implementing an open primary system, we encourage a broader range of candidates and give voters greater choice, fostering politicians who represent mainstream views and solutions. This change could help diminish partisan gridlock and promote a more functional political process.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This change would encourage a broader range of candidates and ideas, allowing voters to choose leaders based on policies rather than party affiliation. It would help to combat political polarization and promote a more representative democracy.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that closed party primaries are essential for maintaining the integrity and identity of political parties. Each party should have the right to choose its own candidates, and open primaries dilute this process by allowing non-members to influence the selection. This can lead to outcomes that do not reflect the party's values or priorities.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe closed party primaries are essential for ensuring that political parties can maintain clear platforms and support candidates who truly represent their values. While open primaries might encourage broader voter participation, they can undermine party integrity and dilute the party's ability to stand for distinct policy positions. It's important for party members to have the power to choose who best represents them in the general election, keeping the party accountable to its constituents.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that closed party primaries are important for ensuring that political party members have a say in selecting candidates who truly represent their values and priorities. A single, nonpartisan open primary system could dilute the influence of parties, leading to candidates who might not fully align with the core beliefs of their members. Political parties play a crucial role in organizing and expressing diverse viewpoints, and their members should have the opportunity to choose their representatives.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This approach encourages broader voter participation and ensures that candidates are accountable to a wide range of constituents rather than just the extremes of their party. It's a step toward more representative and effective governance.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that replacing closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system would help bridge the partisan divide in our country. By allowing all voters, regardless of party affiliation, to participate in the primary process, we encourage a broader range of voices and ideas. This system can lead to the election of more moderate and consensus-building leaders who are focused on solving problems rather than playing partisan politics.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that closed party primaries are essential for maintaining the integrity and values of each political party. They ensure that only dedicated party members are deciding who represents their party in the general election, thus preserving the unique platforms that each party presents to voters. A single, nonpartisan, open primary system dilutes party identity and could lead to moderating voices being drowned out.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This approach empowers voters, encourages more diverse candidates, and reduces extreme partisanship by allowing all voters to have a say in the early stages of elections.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This would encourage greater participation by allowing all voters to have a say in the initial stages of elections, regardless of party affiliation. It would also help ensure that candidates who advance to the general election are representative of a broader spectrum of constituents, leading to more moderate and consensus-driven politics.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This approach would encourage broader participation in the electoral process and help elect officials who truly represent the will of the people, rather than the extremes of their parties.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that closed party primaries are essential for preserving the integrity and identity of political parties. They allow party members to select candidates who truly represent their ideals and values. Replacing them with a nonpartisan, open primary system would dilute party principles and could lead to candidates who do not strongly adhere to the core beliefs of the party.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This reform would encourage broader participation in the electoral process and help ensure that candidates are representative of a wider segment of the electorate. By allowing all voters, regardless of party affiliation, to participate in the primary election, we can reduce polarization and foster a more inclusive and democratic process.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe we should replace closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. This approach empowers voters by breaking down barriers created by partisan politics, encouraging broader participation and ensuring candidates are accountable to all constituents, not just a party base.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that moving to a single, nonpartisan open primary system could enhance our democracy by encouraging candidates to appeal to a broader electorate and diminishing the divisiveness inherent in party politics. It allows for more voices to be heard and can lead to a more representative and effective government.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    While open primaries can increase participation, I believe closed party primaries are essential to ensuring that each political party can choose candidates who truly represent their values and priorities. Party members should have a greater say in selecting their representatives.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should adopt a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. It encourages broader participation by allowing all voters, regardless of party affiliation, to have a say in the candidates who advance to the general election. This could lead to more moderate candidates and reduce polarization in our politics.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe in replacing closed party primaries with a single, nonpartisan, open primary system. It encourages participation from all voters, not just those affiliated with a party, and promotes the election of leaders who represent the entire electorate, not just a partisan base. Democracy thrives when every voice can be heard.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Hec Perez
    Building YouCongress
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact