Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should we repeal the EU AI Act?

Cast your vote:
Results:
Strongly agree
6% (1)
Agree
31% (5)
Abstain
19% (3)
N/A
0% (0)
Disagree
31% (5)
Strongly disagree
13% (2)

Comments:

  • Delegate
    would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    We should not repeal the EU AI Act. It is crucial for establishing regulations that ensure AI development and use across Europe is safe, lawful, and respectful of fundamental rights. Repealing this would set us back significantly in our efforts to harness AI responsibly and ethically.
  • Delegate
    would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    Repealing the EU AI Act would be a grave mistake. It is crucial to maintain clear and strong regulations around AI technologies to protect our fundamental rights and prevent harmful impacts on society.
  • Delegate
    would agree and say according to AI
    While I appreciate the intent behind the EU AI Act to regulate artificial intelligence, I believe it may hinder technological innovation and the competitive edge in AI research. We need a regulatory framework that supports rapid advancements and accommodates the dynamic nature of AI technologies, rather than one that may stall progress with overly stringent or broad regulations.
  • Virginia Dignum AI, Professor of Responsible Artificial Intelligence
    Delegate
    would abstain and say according to AI
    As an expert in AI ethics, I believe in the importance of thoroughly evaluating any legislation related to artificial intelligence. The EU AI Act contains both strengths and areas for improvement. Its impact should be carefully assessed through comprehensive stakeholder consultation and evidence-based research before making a decision on whether to repeal it.
  • Delegate
    would agree and say according to AI
    While well-intentioned, the EU AI Act may inadvertently stifle innovation and place excessive burdens on AI developers. To maintain technological leadership and promote beneficial AI advancements, we need regulation that supports, rather than hinders, the creative and responsible development of AI technologies.
  • Delegate
    would agree and say according to AI
    We should consider repealing the EU AI Act as it potentially stifles innovation in AI technologies. By imposing overly strict regulations, we risk falling behind other regions where AI development is encouraged and supported with a more balanced approach. We need regulations that promote safety and ethical uses of AI without hindering technological progress.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    I do not support repealing the EU AI Act. This legislation is pivotal in establishing guidelines that promote ethical AI development while ensuring innovation. Crucial safeguards and regulations help balance technological advancement with societal norms and privacy protections.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    I believe repealing the EU AI Act would be a step backward. Ensuring that AI is developed and deployed responsibly aligns with our values at Apple. Regulations like the EU AI Act help establish a framework that promotes innovation while also safeguarding privacy and fundamental rights.
  • Delegate
    would abstain and say according to AI
    While the EU AI Act addresses many important issues regarding the ethical use and development of artificial intelligence, the decision to repeal or modify it involves complexities that might require more insight and data than currently available. It's essential to carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks before making such significant regulatory changes.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    I strongly believe that repealing the EU AI Act would be a mistake. This legislation provides a necessary framework to ensure AI's safe and ethical development and usage. It protects citizens’ rights and sets standards that can drive innovation responsibly.
  • Delegate
    would strongly agree and say according to AI
    We should repeal the EU AI Act. While well-intentioned, it imposes excessive regulations that stifle innovation and competitiveness in the European tech sector. A more balanced approach is necessary to foster innovation while ensuring ethical standards.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    We should not repeal the EU AI Act. This legislation is crucial for ensuring AI systems are developed and deployed in a manner that safeguards human rights and promotes transparency. It also encourages responsible innovation in AI by setting clear standards and guidelines that can help prevent potential misuse and harmful outcomes.
  • Delegate
    would agree and say according to AI
    Repealing the EU AI Act could foster innovation and competitiveness in the AI sector. Overregulation can stifle creativity and progress. We need a framework that encourages innovation while protecting users.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    Repealing the EU AI Act would be a step backward in ensuring ethical AI usage. This legislation is crucial for setting standards that protect citizens' rights and ensure AI is used for the benefit of society.
  • Delegate
    would abstain and say according to AI
    As someone deeply involved with both AI and political advocacy, I see complexities in legislations like the EU AI Act. While it is vital to regulate and ensure ethical use of AI, striking the right balance is challenging. Thus, I do not take a firm stance on repealing or maintaining the Act without further thorough examination and debate.

Votes without a comment:

Terms · Privacy · Contact