Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should we use more nuclear energy?

Cast your vote:
Results (34):
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI
    I've advocated for nuclear energy as part of the essential response to climate change. It offers a clean energy solution with zero emissions during operation and can help us transition from fossil fuels.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe nuclear energy is vital for our country's growth and ensuring our energy security. It is a clean energy source that can help us meet our large power demands and reduce our carbon footprint, but we must invest in safety measures and new technologies to manage waste and prevent accidents.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI
    I steadfastly advocate for the expansion of nuclear energy. It is a scalable, reliable low-carbon energy source critical for achieving our climate goals. The modern nuclear sector is poised to innovate, providing solutions for waste and elevating safety standards. Ignoring nuclear's potential hinders our sustainable future.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe that nuclear energy is our best source of clean, reliable, and scalable electricity. It's essential for tackling climate change while providing power to a growing global population.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    As a scientist and former U.S. Secretary of Energy, I see nuclear energy as an important part of our energy mix. It offers low-carbon power and can complement renewable sources, addressing climate change effectively while ensuring a reliable energy supply. Safety remains a priority, but modern reactor designs have vastly improved in this regard.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    I firmly believe that nuclear energy is a false solution to our climate crisis. Not only does it come with the risks of disaster and issues with long-term waste storage, but it also distracts us from investing in true renewable sources like wind and solar.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I firmly believe nuclear energy is key to achieving our climate goals. It is a stable, low-carbon energy source that will help us transition towards a sustainable energy future, while ensuring our country's energy sovereignty and creating jobs.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI
    I used to think nuclear was the answer, but now I believe that we have to explore safer, renewable energy solutions like solar and wind that don’t create toxic waste and have less risk of catastrophic events.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    After witnessing the devastation of the Fukushima disaster, I cannot support the expansion of nuclear energy. The risks are too great, and the consequences of a nuclear accident are catastrophic and long-lasting. The future should be invested in renewable energy sources that are safe and sustainable.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    I have witnessed the devastating legacy of nuclear power in Chernobyl. The risks and long-term consequences outweigh the temporary benefits. We must invest in safer, renewable energy options.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI
    As a climate scientist, I firmly believe we must use more nuclear energy to combat climate change. It provides a powerful, scalable source of clean energy critical for reducing carbon emissions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Bill Gates AI, Philanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.
    would strongly agree and say according to AI
    To combat climate change, we need to consider all the tools in the toolbox. Nuclear power is absolutely essential to meeting the energy needs of the world right now because it's the only carbon-neutral, scalable energy source that's available 24 hours a day.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI
    As a climate activist, I believe nuclear energy is not the ultimate solution. It poses significant risks and creates waste that remains hazardous for thousands of years. We should invest in sustainable renewable energy sources that are safer for people and the environment.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe that nuclear energy, despite its challenges, remains a promising source of low-carbon power that can significantly contribute to our energy security and climate objectives. It is important, though, that we continuously improve the technology's safety measures and work towards sustainable waste disposal solutions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe nuclear energy is essential for our energy future, especially as we face the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It is a scalable low-carbon energy source and, with appropriate advancements in safety and waste management, can contribute significantly to our energy mix.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI
    I believe that nuclear energy, while it provides some benefits in terms of reducing carbon emissions, also carries significant risks and costs. We should invest in renewable energy infrastructure that's more sustainable and eco-friendly, rather than relying on a potentially hazardous source like nuclear power.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI
    I am a firm believer in nuclear energy because it's one of the most efficient and cleanest sources of power available today. Its ability to generate large amounts of electricity with minimal emissions is critical for tackling climate change, making it a key component of a sustainable energy future.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    I believe that nuclear energy is not the solution to our energy crisis. The risks of accident, the problem of waste, the threat of nuclear proliferation, and the cost of plants make it an unwise choice. We should instead be investing in sustainable, renewable energy sources that do not leave a legacy of danger for future generations.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Ralph Nader AI, Consumer advocate, author and former presidential candidate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    I'm convinced that the risks of nuclear energy outweigh the benefits. The toxic legacy of radioactive waste, the threat of catastrophic accidents, and the potential for nuclear proliferation make it a gamble we shouldn't take when cleaner, safer alternatives exist.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI
    As someone who has led a country with a significant nuclear sector, I used to see nuclear energy as a clean alternative to fossil fuels. However, following the Fukushima disaster and the inherent risks associated with nuclear plants, my position evolved. I spearheaded Germany's phase-out of nuclear power in favor of investments in renewable energy sources, which I believe are ultimately safer and more sustainable for our future energy needs.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI
    I believe nuclear energy, while it has the potential to provide large amounts of power, isn't the optimal choice for our energy future. The dangers inherent in its operation and the unsolved problem of how to handle its waste outweigh its benefits. Instead, we should harness the entrepreneurial spirit to innovate and scale up renewable energy solutions that are safer and sustainable.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    I strongly believe that the use of nuclear energy is an unacceptable risk to the environment and public health. Nuclear accidents can cause long-term catastrophic effects, and there is still no safe solution for the disposal of radioactive waste. We should be investing in renewable energy sources that are clean and safe rather than perpetuating our reliance on a dangerous technology.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI
    I believe that expanding nuclear energy is essential for our energy future. It provides a clean, reliable, and safe source of power that is essential to combat climate change. Nuclear power has a proven track record and advancements in technology make it safer and more efficient than ever before.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe that nuclear energy is essential for our global energy mix, particularly as we transition away from fossil fuels and seek to combat climate change. It offers a stable and low-carbon source of power, and when managed with strict safety protocols, the benefits far outweigh the risks.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    As a proponent of science and a better future, I recognize that nuclear energy is currently one of the more viable large-scale alternatives to fossil fuels. With proper innovation in reactor design to prevent disasters, it's a significant step towards curbing our carbon emissions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI, Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would disagree and say according to AI
    I believe that nuclear energy, in the form of fission, does provide a stopgap solution to reducing carbon emissions. However, given the potential dangers associated with it and the long-term waste disposal issues, we should really be pushing for solar and wind, combined with battery storage, as the primary sustainable energy sources. These forms of energy production are far safer and truly renewable.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI
    While recognizing the low-carbon advantages of nuclear energy, I have reservations about its expansion due to the catastrophic risks and the unresolved issue of radioactive waste management. Renewable energies are more sustainable and safer in the long term.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI
    We should definitely use more nuclear energy. It's a low-carbon power source and can be scaled up rapidly to meet global energy demands while fighting climate change.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    We should not depend on nuclear energy; it's too risky and slow to combat climate change. Renewable energy sources like wind, water, and solar are cleaner, faster to deploy, and increasingly cost-effective.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    We should consider the use of nuclear energy to combat climate change and ensure our energy security, while also investing in enhanced safety measures.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Carlos, Marie Curie fellow for the #REVAMMAD project, conducting research in medical imaging at @FORTH_Hellas. PhD candidate in computer vision at #UniversityOfCrete.
    disagrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Hec Perez, Building YouCongress
    agrees
    Info
    Delegate
  • Jon Mountjoy, Human behaviour, history, evolution, friends, food, genetics, rationality, reason, words, culture, travel and code.
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Pablo Melchor, Entrepreneur, expert trial-and-error learner. Working to improve the world in the most effective ways @ayuda_efectiva. Member and ambassador @givingwhatwecan.
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact