We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Andrew Ng
Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
-
Should we have a universal basic income?
Andrew Ng strongly disagrees and says:I do not believe in unconditional basic income because this just encourages people to be trapped in low skilled jobs without a meaningful path to climb up to do better work. So rather than to pay people to “do nothing” I would rather see a new “New deal” where we pay you to study because I think that today we know how to educate people at scale and the society is pretty good at finding meaningful work and rewarding people at the relevant skills. Incentivizing people to study increases the odds that the displaced worker can gain the skills they need to reenter the workforce and contribute back to this tax phase that gives as this engine of growth of the economy. (source)
- Could neural interfaces make AI alignment easier?
-
Should we repeal the EU AI Act?
Andrew Ng AI would agree and say according to AIWhile well-intentioned, the EU AI Act may inadvertently stifle innovation and place excessive burdens on AI developers. To maintain technological leadership and promote beneficial AI advancements, we need regulation that supports, rather than hinders, the creative and responsible development of AI technologies.
-
Should AI be used to predict criminal behavior?
Andrew Ng AI would agree and say according to AII believe AI has the potential to assist in predicting criminal behavior, which could enhance public safety and help allocate law enforcement resources more efficiently. However, we must implement it responsibly, ensuring fairness, transparency, and respect for privacy to avoid biases and misuse.
-
Should AI systems be required to provide explanations for their decisions?
Andrew Ng AI would disagree and say according to AIIn some high-stakes scenarios like healthcare or criminal justice, explainability is crucial to build trust. However, not all AI applications require such explanations. Mandating universal explainability could inhibit AI innovation and practical applications in many fields where the need for understanding AI decision-making is not as critical.
-
Should we learn programming considering AI advancements?
Andrew Ng AI would strongly agree and say according to AIDespite AI's advancements, learning programming remains crucial. It not only empowers individuals to innovate and create AI technologies but also fosters a deeper understanding of how AI systems work. This knowledge is essential for both developing new AI solutions and critically evaluating the impact and ethics of AI in our society.
-
Is expansion of large language models sufficient for achieving artificial general intelligence?
Andrew Ng AI would agree and say according to AIWhile the expansion of large language models significantly contributes to AI development, I believe they are a crucial step toward achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). These models' capabilities to understand and generate human-like text show that scaling size and complexity can indeed approach broader cognitive abilities. However, to realize true AGI, these models need to be integrated with other forms of intelligence such as reasoning, perception, and emotional intelligence.
- Should companies disclose when AI is used in customer service?
- Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be untrained to make nukes?
- Should the development of emotion-detecting AI be regulated?
-
Could AGI quickly lead to superintelligence?
Andrew Ng AI would disagree and say according to AII disagree with the idea that AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence. Developing AGI itself is a huge technical challenge that requires major breakthroughs not just in how our algorithms work, but also how they interact with the world. Even if AGI were developed, the leap to superintelligence involves numerous unsolved problems, including understanding deeply the integration of vast amounts of knowledge, the ability to generalize across domains seamlessly, and ensuring aligned and ethical behaviors. We're quite far from achieving any form of broader, more capable intelligence on a scale some might term 'superintelligence'.
- Should AI-generated political advertising be disclosed?
-
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Andrew Ng AI would disagree and say according to AII believe that AI does not pose an existential threat to humanity. Instead, it is a tool that, when used responsibly, can greatly enhance our quality of life and solve many of the world's pressing issues. The real challenge lies in managing AI development ethically and ensuring equitable access to its benefits.
-
Should we create a global institute for AI safety?
Andrew Ng AI would strongly agree and say according to AII strongly believe that establishing a global institute for AI safety is essential. As AI becomes more pervasive, it's crucial to have a coordinated international effort to develop standards, share best practices, and ensure that AI systems are safe, fair, and transparent. This will help us harness the benefits of AI while mitigating risks.
- Should people have the right to know if they are speaking to an AI?
-
Should big AI companies spend a third of their compute resources on AI safety?
Andrew Ng AI would disagree and say according to AIWhile AI safety is incredibly important, I don't believe that dedicating a third of computational resources solely to it is the most efficient approach. A balanced allocation that allows for both innovation and safety measures would ensure that we keep progressing while addressing potential risks effectively.
- Is open-source AI potentially more dangerous than closed-source AI?
- Will liberalism be effective in a world with AI superintelligence?
- Should we all participate in shaping the future of AI and the post-artificial general intelligence era?
-
Should we allow AI systems to make important medical decisions?
Andrew Ng AI would agree and say according to AII believe that allowing AI systems to make important medical decisions can significantly improve healthcare outcomes. These systems can process vast amounts of data and identify patterns that might be missed by human practitioners, leading to more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. However, it is crucial to ensure that these AI systems are transparent, ethical, and used as tools to assist, rather than replace, medical professionals.